Python 1656.py
class OrderedStream:
def __init__(self, n: int):
self.next = 1
self.data = [] # min-heap
def insert(self, idKey: int, value: str) -> List[str]:
heappush(self.data, (idKey, value))
while self.data and self.data[0][0] == self.next:
self.next += 1
yield heappop(self.data)[1]
Difficulty
and has an acceptance rate of about 83% (100k+ submissions).
Typical patterns to solve this problem:
- Array
- Data Stream
- Design
- Hash Table
AI Disclaimer
However, two years later I set up this website and used various AI tools to generate most of the walkthrough / explanations below.
See this dedicated page for more details.
Code Walkthrough
Overview
The provided OrderedStream class implements a stream that receives elements out of order and yields them in increasing order of their identifiers. The constructor receives the total number of expected elements, while the insert method places a new (idKey, value) pair into an internal priority queue and then emits any consecutive values that become available. The design relies on a min-heap to keep the smallest pending identifier at the top, enabling efficient detection of the next expected element.
Core Components
Initialization
def __init__(self, n: int):
self.next = 1
self.data = [] # min-heap
The constructor sets self.next to the identifier that the stream expects next, starting at 1. An empty list self.data is prepared to serve as a min-heap; the heap will store tuples of the form (idKey, value). The parameter n is accepted but not stored, indicating that the class trusts the caller to respect the total count.
Insertion and Emission
def insert(self, idKey: int, value: str) -> List[str]:
heappush(self.data, (idKey, value))
while self.data and self.data[0][0] == self.next:
self.next += 1
yield heappop(self.data)[1]
The insert method performs three logical actions:
-
Heap insertion -
heappushadds the incoming pair to the heap, preserving the heap invariant. This guarantees that the smallest identifier among all pending elements is always accessible atself.data[0]. -
Consecutive check loop - The
whilecondition examines two aspects: the heap is non-empty, and the smallest identifier matches the current expectation (self.next). If both hold, the loop body executes. -
Yielding values - Inside the loop,
self.nextis incremented to reflect that the current identifier has been satisfied.heappopremoves the smallest element from the heap, and its associatedvalueis yielded to the caller. The loop repeats as long as the next expected identifier is present at the heap’s root, allowing the method to emit a contiguous block of values in a single call.
Edge-Case Handling
The implementation gracefully manages several boundary situations without explicit conditional branches:
-
Insertion of the expected identifier first - When
idKeyequalsself.next, the heap’s root immediately satisfies the loop condition, causing the value to be yielded right away. The increment ofself.nextprepares the stream for the following identifier. -
Out-of-order arrivals - If an element arrives with an identifier larger than
self.next, it is stored in the heap. The loop condition fails because the smallest identifier in the heap does not matchself.next, so no value is yielded. Later arrivals that fill the gap will trigger the loop, releasing all pending consecutive values. -
Duplicate identifiers - Although the code does not explicitly guard against duplicates, the heap will contain both entries. When the first occurrence is popped,
self.nextadvances, and the second duplicate will sit at the heap’s root with an identifier that no longer matchesself.next. Consequently, it will remain in the heap indefinitely, effectively being ignored by the emission logic. This behavior ensures that only the first occurrence influences the output order. -
Exhaustion of the stream - When all identifiers up to
nhave been yielded,self.nextwill ben+1. Subsequent insertions (if any) will never satisfy the loop condition because the expected identifier is beyond the defined range, so no further values are emitted.
Performance Optimizations
The design leverages a min-heap to keep insertion and extraction operations efficient. By using heappush and heappop, each insertion and each removal of the smallest element runs in logarithmic time relative to the number of pending items. This choice avoids linear scans that would be required if a simple list were used, especially when the stream receives many out-of-order elements.
The while loop processes consecutive identifiers in a single pass. As soon as the smallest pending identifier matches the expectation, the loop extracts it and immediately checks the next smallest. This approach minimizes the number of heap operations: a contiguous block of ready elements results in a series of heappop calls without intervening heap rebuilds, because each pop maintains the heap property automatically.
Yielding values directly from the method rather than accumulating them in an intermediate collection reduces memory overhead. The generator semantics allow the caller to consume each value as it becomes available, which is advantageous when the stream is large or when downstream processing can begin before the entire set of elements is received.
The use of a single integer self.next to track the next required identifier eliminates the need for auxiliary data structures such as hash sets or boolean arrays to record which identifiers have arrived. This compact state representation contributes to lower constant-factor overhead during each insertion.
Concluding Remarks
The OrderedStream class presents a concise implementation that combines a min-heap with a simple counter to reorder out-of-order inputs efficiently. The code handles the primary edge cases of early arrivals, gaps, and duplicate identifiers through its loop condition and heap ordering. Performance is optimized by relying on heap operations that scale logarithmically and by emitting values lazily via a generator, thereby keeping both time and space usage modest for typical streaming workloads.
ELI5 - Simplified Explanation
Imagine a toy robot that organizes special blocks for a giant puzzle. The robot has a tiny shelf where it keeps blocks that arrive out of order. At the very beginning, the robot is waiting for the block labeled number one to show up.
When a new block arrives, the robot places it on its hidden shelf. It sorts all the blocks so the one with the smallest number is always right at the front. The robot then checks that front block to see if it is the specific number it is waiting for right now. If the number matches, the robot takes that block off the shelf and sets it aside to show it is ready. Then, it changes the number it is looking for to the next one in line. It keeps checking the shelf over and over again to see if the next block it needs is already waiting there. If it finds the next one, it takes that one out too and keeps going until it reaches a block that has not arrived yet.
Code Quality
Complexity Analysis
Other Solutions
Obviously, I did that after I solved the problem myself.
In general, AlgoMonster and WalkCCC solutions are high-quality and always worth a look.
I haven't checked most of the other solutions, but they might be helpful as well.
And of course, the LeetCode forum is always a good place (or even the best) to look for alternative approaches.
(click on a column header to sort the table)
| author | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| author | solutions | |||||||||
| www | AlgoMonster | Python | C++ | Java | TS | |||||
| WalkCCC | Python | C++ | Java | |||||||
| leetcode.ca | Python | C++ | Java | Go | Rust | TS | ||||
| Progiez | Python | C++ | Java | |||||||
| github | black-shadows | C++ | ||||||||
| chandansgowda | Python | |||||||||
| charles-wangkai | Java | |||||||||
| DimitrisJim | C | |||||||||
| everthis | JS | |||||||||
| fsq | C++ | |||||||||
| halfrost | Go | |||||||||
| JoshCrozier | JS | |||||||||
| Krazune | C++ | |||||||||
| lkwq007 | Python | |||||||||
| muhammadfarhankt | Go | |||||||||
| suxrobGM | C# | |||||||||
| trung-hn | Python | |||||||||
| varunu28 | Java | |||||||||
| YuriSpiridonov | Python | |||||||||
| AlgoMonster | C++, Python, Java, TypeScript | |||||||||
| WalkCCC | C++, Python, Java | |||||||||
| leetcode.ca | C++, Go, Java, Python, Rust, TypeScript | |||||||||
| Progiez | C++, Java, Python | |||||||||
| black-shadows | C++, C++ | |||||||||
| chandansgowda | Python | |||||||||
| charles-wangkai | Java | |||||||||
| DimitrisJim | C | |||||||||
| everthis | JavaScript | |||||||||
| fsq | C++ | |||||||||
| halfrost | Go | |||||||||
| JoshCrozier | JavaScript | |||||||||
| Krazune | C++ | |||||||||
| lkwq007 | Python | |||||||||
| muhammadfarhankt | Go | |||||||||
| suxrobGM | C# | |||||||||
| trung-hn | Python | |||||||||
| varunu28 | Java | |||||||||
| YuriSpiridonov | Python |
Videos
Similar Problems
- problem 2424: Longest Uploaded Prefix
Solved On The Same Day
- problem 1603: Design Parking System
- problem 665: Non-decreasing Array
- problem 1361: Validate Binary Tree Nodes
- problem 1472: Design Browser History
- problem 2166: Design Bitset
- problem 2502: Design Memory Allocator
Extra
- Tech Stack - my development environment and tools
- AI - how AI helped me create this website (NOT solving the problems)
- Progress - progression over time
- Quality - code quality